Inherent Fallacies Essay

We hu piece of musics live in a world were illogical fallacies run rampant. In 12 Angry Men the author illustrates everyday illogical fallacies people have in the backcloth of a court jury. jurywomans 3, 4, 7 and 10 have their own fallacies that ar unique to them in the range but evoke be found in common people in everyday people. In 12 Angry Men the illogical fallacy for Juror Number 3 is a popular fallacy. This fallacy is the result of an emotional prejudice by juror 3 has as he comp atomic number 18s the suspect with his own child. Juror 3 says in the play, Youre right.Its the kids.The right smart they areyou jockey? They jadet listen. Ive got a kid. When he was eight years old, he ran a stylus from a fight. I saw him. I was so ashamed, I told him right out, Im gonna make a man out of you or Im gonna bust you up into little pieces trying. When he was fifteen he hit me in the face. Hes big, you know. I havent seen him in three years. filthy kid You work your heart out. comp allowely right, lets get on with it. (Reginald arise 8) His emotional prejudice gets in the way of his sarcasticly thinking through the evidence because he has emotional conflict with his own son.He is grouping all teens together because of his altercation with his son, and Juror 3 is honourable punishing the young man on trial because he cannot come to turns with his own failings as a parent with his child. Towards the end of the play Juror 3 is all alone on the voter turnout look at he looks around at all of them for a long time. They sit silently, waiting for him to speak, and all of them disdain him for his stubbornness. Then, suddenly, his face contorts as if he is about to cry, and he slams his fist down on the table (thundering) All right (30).Juror Number 4 and 10 each has prejudices about slum dwellers. This prejudice gives way to genetic fallacies in each jurors thinking that at the beginning of the deliberations cause them to vote guilty in the initial prelimi nary vote. Juror 4, for example, says, Were missing the point here. This boylets say hes a product of a filthy neighborhood and a broken home. We cant help that. Were not here to go into the reasons why slums are breeding grounds for criminals. They are. I know it. So do you. The children who come out of slum backgrounds are potential menaces to society. 23)The play says that he is a man of wealth and position. We can also determine this by his attitude about people from the ghetto from his previously mentioned statement. Juror 10 is prejudice for the fact that he came from the slums,I bustt mind telling you, mister. We dont owe him a thing. He got a decorous trial, didnt he? You know what that trial cost? Hes lucky he got it. attend to, were all grownups here. Youre not going to tell us that were supposed to believe him, intentional what he is. Ive lived among em all my life. You cant believe a word they say. You know that. 5)This line of thinking also can be seen when Juror 4 tells them, Next, the boy claims that on the way home the knife must have fallen through a hole in his come up pocket, that he never saw it again. Now theres a story, gentlemen. You know what actually happened. The boy took the knife home and a few hours later stabbed his father with it and even remembered to wipe off the fingerprints (9). Juror Number Seven has no need to go over the facts again he votes with whatever the absolute majority of the vote is deciding. Juror 7 is in a hurry to get to the play he has tickets for as noted on page 3, Right. This better be fast.Ive got tickets to The Seven Year Itch tonight. I must be the only guy in the whole world who hasnt seen it yet. (He laughs and sits down. ) Okay, your honor, start the try (3). His prejudice that gets in the way of him critically thinking through the case is selfishness, which leads to a slippery huckster illogical fallacy in the play. He says to the foreman,I dont know, most of its been said already. We can ta lk all day about this thing, but I think were wasting our time. Look at the kids record. At fifteen he was in reform school. He steal a car. Hes been arrested for mugging. He was picked up for knife-fighting.I think they said he stabbed psyche in the arm. This is a very fine boy. (7) This statement highlights the laziness of juror 7 to mean for not necessarily do any of those things correlate with killing his father. The prejudices of all jurors are the basis of the story. These prejudices lead to umteen illogical fallacies that are constituten and resolved throughout the play for each juror. They are attempts by the author to show how every day are riddled with fallacies of logic and how peoples personal conflicts cloud their critical thinking to reason. This play suggests that we all need to examine ourselves before we rush to any type of judgment.